Description: Ruth Carey is a registered dietitian and nutritionist who is urging a NO vote on Measure 92 because its misleading labels would provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers. Ruth tells voters how its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would conflict with existing national labeling standards that provide consumers with accurate and reliable choices. Look into the facts yourself by visiting FactsAbout92.com.
Fish Labeling Facts
Description: Contrary to deceptive ads run by its proponents, Measure 92 is unneeded for labeling of salmon and other fish that are required by federal law to be labeled as to origin, production methods and where it’s raised or caught. Furthermore, its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would hurt thousands of family farmers and small businesses, provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and increase food prices for Oregon families, especially hurting those who can least afford it. Get the facts about Measure 92 at FactsAbout92.com.
Costs of Measure 92
Description: Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot would create a complex and misleading Oregon-only food labeling system that no other state requires. Its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would hurt thousands of family farmers and small businesses, provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and increase food prices by hundreds of dollars per year for Oregon families, especially hurting those who can least afford it. Get the facts about Measure 92 at VoteNOon92.com.
Wall Street Journal: Coming to a Ballot Near You: Food Labeling Wars
Wall Street Journal Assistant Editorial Features Editor Kate Bachelder on organic food labeling ballot initiatives in several states, and what’s at stake for consumers.
Taxpayer Costs
Description: Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot would create a complex and misleading Oregon-only food labeling system that no other state requires. Its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would hurt thousands of family farmers and small businesses, provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and increase food prices for Oregon families, especially hurting those who can least afford it.
Separate System
Description: Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot would create a complex and misleading Oregon-only food labeling system that no other state requires. Its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would hurt thousands of family farmers and small businesses, provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and increase food prices for Oregon families, especially hurting those who can least afford it.
False, Misleading & Costly
Description: Find out why a broad and growing statewide coalition of family farmers, scientists, taxpayer advocates, food producers, businesses, organizations and consumers from across Oregon are urging a NO vote on Measure 92. Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot would create a complex and misleading Oregon-only food labeling system that no other state requires. Its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would hurt thousands of family farmers and small businesses, provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and increase food prices for Oregon families, especially hurting those who can least afford it.
Brenda, New Mom and Family Farmer
Description: As a farmer and new mom, Brenda joins family farmers statewide in a NO vote on Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot. It would a misleading Oregon-only food labeling system that no other state requires. Measure 92 would provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers about the foods we buy, and conflict with existing national labels that already give more reliable consumers information about GMO-free foods. Look into the facts and vote NO on Measure 92
Molly, Farmer and Food Bank Advocate
Description: Molly McCargar is an organic and non-GMO farmer who also donates a portion of her farms’ crops to area food banks. Family farmers across Oregon such as Molly are urging a NO vote on Measure 92 on the November 2014 Oregon statewide ballot. It would create a separate and costly food labeling system in Oregon that no other state requires. That would increase grocery costs for Oregon families, especially hurting people on low and fixed incomes who can least afford it. Look into the facts yourself and vote NO on Measure 92.
Opposite of Truth in Labeling
Description: Ruth Carey is a registered dietitian and nutritionist who is urging a NO vote on Measure 92 because its misleading labels would provide inaccurate and unreliable information for Oregon consumers. Ruth tells voters how its poorly written labeling requirements and arbitrary exemptions would conflict with existing national labeling standards that provide consumers with accurate and reliable choices. Look into the facts yourself and vote NO on Measure 92.
← Older Posts